000 03881nam a2200433 4500
999 _c2772
_d2772
003 OSt
005 20230101223608.0
008 860929 1986 enkb b eng d
010 _a85-29153
020 _a0521311136 (pbk)
035 _a(OCoLC)17005246
040 _aOOU
_bEng
_cJCRC
082 0 _a300/.723
099 _aH 62 .B65 1986
100 1 _aBriggs, Charles L.,
_d1953-
245 1 0 _aLearning How to Ask :
_ba Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research /
_cCharles L. Briggs.
260 _aNew York :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c1986.
300 _axv, 155 p. :
_b1 map ;
_c24 cm.
440 0 _aStudies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 132-148) and index.
505 _a"Interviews are ubiquitous in modern society, and they play a crucial role in social scientific research. But, as Charles Briggs convincingly argues in this book, received interviewing techniques rest on fundamental misapprehensions about the nature both of the interview as a communicative event, and of the nature of the data that it produces. Furthermore, interviewers rarely examine the compatibility of interviews as a means of acquiring information to one another. These oversights often blind interviewers to ensuing errors of interpretation, as well as to the limitations of the interview as a means of acquiring data. To confront these problems, Professor Briggs presents an analysis of the 'communicative blunders' that he himself committed in conducting research interviews among Spanish-speakers in northern New Mexico. By focusing on these errors and exploring how they may be avoided, he is able to propose new techniques for designing, implementing, and analyzing interview-based research. These rest on identifying the subjects' resources for conveying information, and the relative compatibility of the shared rules and understandings that underlie their strategies with those associated with interviews. Critical of existing paradigms of interviewing, which he sees as deriving from Western 'folk' theories of reality and communication, Briggs shows that the development of more sophisticated interviewing methodologies requires further research into interviewing itself. Briggs's conclusions provide a basis for the reexamination of current uses of interviews in a wide range of contexts - from social science research to job applications, welfare and health care delivery, criminal and legal investigations, journalism and broadcasting, and other areas of everyday life. His book will appeal to linguists, sociologists, anthropologists, historians, psychologists, as well as other readers whose research or professional activities depend on the use of interviews." (Book Cover)
505 _aCONTENTS
505 _aForeward by Aaron V. Cicourel
505 _aPreface
505 _a1. Introduction
505 _a2. The setting: Mexicano society and Córdova, New Mexico
505 _a3. Interview techniques vis-à-vis native metacommunicative repertoires; or, on the analysis of communicative blunders
505 _a4. The acquisition of metacommunicative competence
505 _a5. Listen before you leap: toward methodological sophistication
505 _a6. Conclusion: theoretical quagmires and "purely methodological" issues
505 _aNotes
505 _aReferences
505 _aIndex
650 0 _aSocial sciences
_xResearch.
650 0 _aInterviewing.
856 _uhttps://www.cambridge.org/ca/academic/subjects/languages-linguistics/sociolinguistics/learning-how-ask-sociolinguistic-appraisal-role-interview-social-science-research?format=PB
_zPublisher's Website.
856 _uhttps://ocul-uo.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01OCUL_UO/1lm0b9c/alma991023128439705161
_zCheck the UO Library catalog.
942 _2z
_cBK